BBHM vs. TPLC
BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) and TPLC (Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - BBHM tracks the Actively Managed while TPLC tracks the Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBHM charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for TPLC.
Performance
BBHM vs. TPLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBHM achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than TPLC's 8.78% return.
BBHM
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPLC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 12.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- —
BBHM vs. TPLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | 2.14% | 2.74% |
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 8.78% | 1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHM and TPLC is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBHM vs. TPLC — Risk / Return Rank
BBHM
TPLC
BBHM vs. TPLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBHM | TPLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.56 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
BBHM vs. TPLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBHM drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum TPLC drawdown of -38.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHM and TPLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHM | TPLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -38.02% | +28.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.95% | -0.12% | -4.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -5.29% | +2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.13% | — |
Volatility
BBHM vs. TPLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBHM | TPLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.52% | 11.50% | +6.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 16.14% | +1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 19.89% | -2.37% |
BBHM vs. TPLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBHM has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than TPLC's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBHM vs. TPLC - Dividend Comparison
BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TPLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 0.84% | 0.89% | 0.88% | 0.89% | 1.06% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBHM and TPLC have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TPLC is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TPLC is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.
TPLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.
BBHM tracks Actively Managed, while TPLC tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index. They also come from different issuers: BBH and Timothy Plan. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BBHM and 0.52% for TPLC.
Find the right allocation for BBHM and TPLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer