PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBHM vs. BBHL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBHM vs. BBHL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBHM achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than BBHL's 5.40% return.


BBHM

1D
-0.35%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
1.78%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBHL

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.91%
YTD
5.40%
6M
5.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBHM vs. BBHL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BBHM
BBH Select Mid Cap ETF
1.78%2.74%
BBHL
BBH Select Large Cap ETF
5.40%2.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BBHM and BBHL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBHM vs. BBHL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BBHM vs. BBHL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBHMBBHLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

1.26

-0.76

Drawdowns

BBHM vs. BBHL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBHM drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum BBHL drawdown of -11.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHM and BBHL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBHMBBHLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.78%

-11.99%

+2.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.28%

-0.53%

-4.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.71%

-3.01%

+0.30%

Volatility

BBHM vs. BBHL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBHMBBHLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.46%

12.70%

+4.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

12.70%

+4.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.46%

12.70%

+4.76%

BBHM vs. BBHL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBHM has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHL's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBHM vs. BBHL - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBHM nor BBHL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BBHM and BBHL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBHL is cheaper at 0.71% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBHL is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.

BBHM and BBHL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BBHM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BBHL is Large Cap Growth Equities. Both ETFs track Actively Managed. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BBHM and 0.71% for BBHL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBHM and BBHL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer