PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCTR vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCTR vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTR achieves a 12.71% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 10.06% return.


FCTR

1D
0.00%
1M
2.53%
YTD
12.71%
6M
10.54%
1Y
20.02%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.39%
1M
3.97%
YTD
10.06%
6M
11.27%
1Y
34.18%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
23.65%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCTR vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
12.71%8.63%19.54%0.71%-20.42%21.13%30.17%30.91%-12.50%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
10.06%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTR and YCS is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.04

The correlation between FCTR and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCTR vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCTR
FCTR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FCTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCTR vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCTRYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.38

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

4.14

-2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.47

13.04

-6.57

FCTR vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTR and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCTR vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTR drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTR and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCTRYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.10%

-49.56%

+12.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-8.30%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.63%

-23.05%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.10%

-27.32%

-9.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

0.00%

-2.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.34%

-19.87%

+9.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.63%

+0.47%

Volatility

FCTR vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that FCTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCTRYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

2.25%

+4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.51%

11.91%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.30%

16.93%

+1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

21.10%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.96%

18.82%

+3.14%

FCTR vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCTR vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

FCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
0.36%0.30%0.82%1.04%1.38%0.46%0.44%0.98%0.66%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCTR and YCS have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCTR has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTR dropped -37.10% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.65% vs 3.73% for FCTR. On fees, FCTR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.65% return vs 3.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCTR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

FCTR has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

FCTR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. FCTR tracks Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FCTR and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCTR and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer