PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCTR vs. DLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCTR vs. DLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTR achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 10.76% return.


FCTR

1D
0.77%
1M
9.06%
YTD
16.05%
6M
15.92%
1Y
24.13%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
4.45%
10Y*

DLN

1D
0.76%
1M
3.16%
YTD
10.76%
6M
10.83%
1Y
23.83%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCTR vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
16.05%8.63%19.54%0.71%-20.42%21.13%30.17%30.91%-12.94%
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
10.76%15.53%19.66%9.95%-3.78%25.60%4.59%28.91%-8.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTR and DLN is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018

0.78

The correlation between FCTR and DLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCTR vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCTR
DLN

Technology

19.3%
20.1%

Financial Services

18.7%
18.0%

Healthcare

9.4%
12.6%

Industrials

9.4%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
9.3%

Real Estate

7.8%
4.0%

Energy

6.5%
8.5%

Basic Materials

4.6%
1.0%

Utilities

4.3%
5.9%

Communication Services

3.5%
7.8%

Technology

FCTR
19.3%
DLN
20.1%

Financial Services

FCTR
18.7%
DLN
18.0%

Healthcare

FCTR
9.4%
DLN
12.6%

Industrials

FCTR
9.4%
DLN
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FCTR
8.5%
DLN
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

FCTR
8.1%
DLN
9.3%

Real Estate

FCTR
7.8%
DLN
4.0%

Energy

FCTR
6.5%
DLN
8.5%

Basic Materials

FCTR
4.6%
DLN
1.0%

Utilities

FCTR
4.3%
DLN
5.9%

Communication Services

FCTR
3.5%
DLN
7.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCTR vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCTR
FCTR Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FCTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

DLN
DLN Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCTR vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCTRDLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.49

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

3.93

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.93

16.60

-8.67

FCTR vs. DLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the DLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTR and DLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCTRDLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.70

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.94

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.53

-0.06

Drawdowns

FCTR vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTR drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTR and DLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCTRDLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.10%

-57.84%

+20.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-6.10%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.63%

-13.71%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.10%

-16.26%

-20.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-7.52%

-2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

1.44%

+1.61%

Volatility

FCTR vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) at 2.22%. This indicates that FCTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCTRDLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

2.22%

+4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.79%

6.80%

+4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.54%

8.89%

+8.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.64%

13.27%

+6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.94%

16.15%

+5.79%

FCTR vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCTR vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison

FCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than DLN's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
1.78%1.90%2.00%2.43%2.53%2.01%2.66%2.51%2.90%2.33%2.64%2.80%
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
0.35%0.30%0.82%1.04%1.38%0.46%0.44%0.98%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCTR and DLN have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCTR has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to DLN (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTR dropped -37.10% vs DLN's -57.84%.

On 5-year performance, DLN leads with 12.39% vs 4.45% for FCTR. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DLN has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 4.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FCTR.

DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.35% for FCTR.

FCTR tracks Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FCTR and 0.28% for DLN.

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCTR and DLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer