PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCSSX vs. FYHTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCSSX vs. FYHTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FCSSX having a 21.09% return and FYHTX slightly lower at 20.64%.


FCSSX

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
21.09%
6M
21.06%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
6.53%

FYHTX

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
20.64%
6M
20.58%
1Y
31.68%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCSSX vs. FYHTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCSSX
Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund
21.09%15.43%5.36%-8.25%18.11%27.59%-3.11%7.41%-12.10%6.21%
FYHTX
Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund
20.64%14.72%4.73%-8.62%15.32%26.43%-3.84%6.91%-11.71%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FCSSX and FYHTX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2017

0.99

The correlation between FCSSX and FYHTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCSSX vs. FYHTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCSSX
FCSSX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FCSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FYHTX
FYHTX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FYHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FYHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCSSX vs. FYHTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCSSXFYHTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

2.29

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.97

2.95

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.55

4.43

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.93

11.51

+0.42

FCSSX vs. FYHTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the FYHTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCSSX and FYHTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCSSXFYHTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.29

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.64

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.49

-0.39

Drawdowns

FCSSX vs. FYHTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSSX drawdown since its inception was -66.04%, which is greater than FYHTX's maximum drawdown of -33.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSSX and FYHTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCSSXFYHTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.04%

-33.22%

-32.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-7.22%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.43%

-11.52%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-25.47%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.40%

-3.41%

-5.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-11.95%

-24.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.77%

-0.03%

Volatility

FCSSX vs. FYHTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) have volatilities of 4.53% and 4.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCSSXFYHTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

4.53%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

11.55%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28%

14.11%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

15.85%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.34%

14.47%

-0.13%

FCSSX vs. FYHTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FYHTX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCSSX vs. FYHTX - Dividend Comparison

FCSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than FYHTX's 2.43% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCSSX
Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund
2.22%2.69%12.74%4.53%128.24%41.74%0.44%1.49%6.76%0.53%
FYHTX
Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund
2.43%2.93%3.78%4.10%57.34%15.05%0.00%7.00%12.49%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FCSSX and FYHTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FYHTX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to FCSSX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCSSX dropped -66.04% vs FYHTX's -33.22%.

FCSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCSSX and FYHTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer