FCSPX vs. FGSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX).
FCSPX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Jun 20, 2006. FGSAX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Aug 23, 1984.
Performance
FCSPX vs. FGSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCSPX vs. FGSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSPX Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port | -1.35% | 8.13% | 2.78% | 8.48% | -16.25% | -0.95% | 11.90% | 16.59% | -3.05% | 8.03% |
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund | -9.53% | 10.54% | 32.97% | 27.05% | -24.60% | 22.39% | 35.50% | 27.95% | -3.23% | 24.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCSPX achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly higher than FGSAX's -9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FCSPX has underperformed FGSAX with an annualized return of 3.42%, while FGSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.50% annualized return.
FCSPX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -1.35%
- 6M
- -0.42%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.42%
FGSAX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -9.34%
- YTD
- -9.53%
- 6M
- -11.83%
- 1Y
- 8.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCSPX vs. FGSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCSPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FGSAX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCSPX vs. FGSAX — Risk / Return Rank
FCSPX
FGSAX
FCSPX vs. FGSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCSPX | FGSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.27 | +0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 0.54 | +0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.08 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 0.29 | +1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 0.89 | +4.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCSPX | FGSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.27 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.42 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.61 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.47 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCSPX and FGSAX is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FCSPX vs. FGSAX - Dividend Comparison
FCSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than FGSAX's 5.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSPX Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port | 4.38% | 4.59% | 3.95% | 3.35% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.51% | 3.95% | 4.88% | 4.09% | 4.30% | 4.59% |
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund | 5.44% | 4.92% | 4.32% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 25.75% | 7.07% | 8.13% | 14.46% | 13.93% | 0.89% | 25.34% |
Drawdowns
FCSPX vs. FGSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCSPX drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, smaller than the maximum FGSAX drawdown of -66.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSPX and FGSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCSPX | FGSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.68% | -66.17% | +43.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.19% | -13.73% | +10.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.68% | -35.79% | +13.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.68% | -37.19% | +14.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -13.73% | +11.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -16.19% | +12.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 4.50% | -3.53% |
Volatility
FCSPX vs. FGSAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) is 1.77%, while Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that FCSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCSPX | FGSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.77% | 5.44% | -3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | 13.89% | -10.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.10% | 20.42% | -15.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.78% | 22.39% | -15.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.21% | 22.29% | -16.08% |