PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCSPX vs. SMARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCSPX vs. SMARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) and Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCSPX vs. SMARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCSPX
Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port
-1.35%8.13%2.78%8.48%-16.25%-0.95%11.90%16.59%-3.05%8.03%
SMARX
Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust
-0.30%6.91%3.73%9.76%-11.77%0.76%6.55%7.77%-1.13%4.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCSPX achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly lower than SMARX's -0.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCSPX having a 3.42% annualized return and SMARX not far behind at 3.34%.


FCSPX

1D
0.50%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
-1.35%
6M
-0.42%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
3.42%

SMARX

1D
0.64%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
-0.30%
6M
0.49%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
3.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCSPX vs. SMARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SMARX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FCSPX vs. SMARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCSPX
FCSPX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FCSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SMARX
SMARX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SMARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMARX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SMARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMARX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCSPX vs. SMARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) and Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCSPXSMARXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

1.14

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

1.63

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.20

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.89

-0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.54

6.07

-0.53

FCSPX vs. SMARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the SMARX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCSPX and SMARX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCSPXSMARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.14

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.39

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.77

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.41

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between FCSPX and SMARX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FCSPX vs. SMARX - Dividend Comparison

FCSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than SMARX's 4.71% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCSPX
Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port
4.38%4.59%3.95%3.35%3.28%3.36%3.51%3.95%4.88%4.09%4.30%4.59%
SMARX
Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust
4.71%5.02%4.07%3.85%3.53%2.57%3.35%4.19%4.55%4.20%4.87%5.24%

Drawdowns

FCSPX vs. SMARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSPX drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, smaller than the maximum SMARX drawdown of -47.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSPX and SMARX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FCSPXSMARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.68%

-47.07%

+24.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-2.63%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.68%

-16.20%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.68%

-16.20%

-6.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-1.99%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-7.02%

+2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.82%

+0.15%

Volatility

FCSPX vs. SMARX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) has a higher volatility of 1.77% compared to Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX) at 1.66%. This indicates that FCSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FCSPXSMARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

1.66%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

2.56%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.10%

4.03%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.78%

5.12%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.21%

4.37%

+1.84%