PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCSPX vs. VSTBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCSPX vs. VSTBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSTBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCSPX achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than VSTBX's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FCSPX has outperformed VSTBX with an annualized return of 3.37%, while VSTBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.99% annualized return.


FCSPX

1D
0.20%
1M
1.11%
YTD
0.77%
6M
1.52%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
3.37%

VSTBX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.88%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
2.45%
10Y*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCSPX vs. VSTBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCSPX
Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port
0.77%8.13%2.78%8.48%-16.25%-0.95%11.90%16.59%-3.05%8.03%
VSTBX
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.73%6.75%5.37%6.17%-5.73%-0.41%5.07%9.68%0.92%2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FCSPX and VSTBX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2009

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between FCSPX and VSTBX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCSPX vs. VSTBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCSPX
FCSPX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FCSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

VSTBX
VSTBX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VSTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VSTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCSPX vs. VSTBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSTBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCSPXVSTBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.49

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

3.35

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.48

13.18

-6.70

FCSPX vs. VSTBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the VSTBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCSPX and VSTBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCSPX vs. VSTBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSPX drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, which is greater than VSTBX's maximum drawdown of -9.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSPX and VSTBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCSPXVSTBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.68%

-9.34%

-13.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-1.31%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.14%

-1.31%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.68%

-9.34%

-13.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.68%

-9.34%

-13.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.24%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-0.95%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.33%

+0.61%

Volatility

FCSPX vs. VSTBX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSTBX) at 0.66%. This indicates that FCSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSTBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCSPXVSTBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.66%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.24%

1.34%

+1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.48%

1.78%

+2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.79%

2.72%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.23%

2.38%

+3.85%

FCSPX vs. VSTBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VSTBX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FCSPX vs. VSTBX - Dividend Comparison

FCSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than VSTBX's 4.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCSPX
Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port
4.82%4.59%3.95%3.35%3.28%3.36%3.51%3.95%4.88%4.09%4.30%4.59%
VSTBX
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.44%4.34%4.29%3.09%2.00%1.80%2.27%5.40%2.67%2.27%1.96%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCSPX and VSTBX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCSPX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to VSTBX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCSPX dropped -22.68% vs VSTBX's -9.34%.

VSTBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCSPX and VSTBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer