PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCOR vs. IGIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCOR vs. IGIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) and iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCOR achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly higher than IGIB's 0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOR has underperformed IGIB with an annualized return of 2.89%, while IGIB has yielded a comparatively higher 3.04% annualized return.


FCOR

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.32%
1Y
6.06%
3Y*
5.65%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*
2.89%

IGIB

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.14%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
6.21%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
3.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCOR vs. IGIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCOR
Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF
0.48%7.88%3.01%8.95%-15.88%-1.64%11.39%14.87%-3.04%6.13%
IGIB
iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.21%9.58%3.49%9.22%-14.00%-1.66%9.64%14.60%-0.71%3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FCOR and IGIB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014

0.82

The correlation between FCOR and IGIB shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.94 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCOR vs. IGIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCOR
FCOR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

IGIB
IGIB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IGIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGIB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IGIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGIB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCOR vs. IGIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) and iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCORIGIBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.52

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

2.26

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

2.09

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.21

7.08

-0.87

FCOR vs. IGIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the IGIB Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCOR and IGIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCORIGIBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.52

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.21

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.50

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.70

-0.27

Drawdowns

FCOR vs. IGIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, which is greater than IGIB's maximum drawdown of -20.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOR and IGIB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCORIGIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.60%

-20.62%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-3.01%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.60%

-6.05%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.60%

-20.62%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.60%

-20.62%

-1.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-1.33%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-2.58%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

0.89%

+0.09%

Volatility

FCOR vs. IGIB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) at 1.33%. This indicates that FCOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCORIGIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

1.33%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.32%

3.08%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38%

4.14%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.06%

6.56%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.10%

6.06%

+1.04%

FCOR vs. IGIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCOR has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than IGIB's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCOR vs. IGIB - Dividend Comparison

FCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than IGIB's 4.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCOR
Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF
4.55%4.47%4.35%3.70%3.30%2.34%2.99%3.10%3.65%2.81%3.04%3.82%
IGIB
iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.82%4.59%4.41%3.78%3.04%2.52%2.74%3.44%3.41%2.51%2.45%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCOR and IGIB have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCOR has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to IGIB (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCOR dropped -22.60% vs IGIB's -20.62%.

On 10-year performance, IGIB leads with 3.04% vs 2.89% for FCOR. On fees, IGIB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IGIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGIB has performed better with a 3.04% return vs 2.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGIB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FCOR.

IGIB has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 4.55% for FCOR.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FCOR and 0.06% for IGIB.

IGIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCOR and IGIB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer