FCOR vs. FELG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCOR (Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF) and FELG (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCOR is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FELG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FCOR returned 6.06% vs 27.58% for FELG. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCOR charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for FELG.

Performance

FCOR vs. FELG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCOR achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than FELG's 7.70% return.

FCOR

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: 0.32%
• 1Y: 6.06%
• 3Y*: 5.65%
• 5Y*: 0.70%
• 10Y*: 2.89%

FELG

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 5.85%
• YTD: 7.70%
• 6M: 7.23%
• 1Y: 27.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCOR vs. FELG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FCOR Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF	0.48%	7.88%	3.01%	5.71%
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	7.70%	18.44%	35.45%	4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FCOR and FELG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023	0.21

Return for Risk

FCOR vs. FELG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCOR

FCOR Risk / Return Rank: 38
FCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 39

FELG

FELG Risk / Return Rank: 44
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCOR vs. FELG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCOR	FELG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	1.79	-0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	2.45	-0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.31	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	1.71	+0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.21	5.86	+0.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCOR vs. FELG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the FELG Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCOR and FELG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCOR	FELG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39	1.79	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	1.32	-0.90

Drawdowns

FCOR vs. FELG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, smaller than the maximum FELG drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOR and FELG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCOR	FELG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.60%	-23.89%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.06%	-16.17%	+13.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	-1.34%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.73%	-3.52%	-1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.98%	4.72%	-3.74%

Volatility

FCOR vs. FELG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) is 1.61%, while Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that FCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCOR	FELG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.61%	3.50%	-1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.32%	11.59%	-8.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.38%	15.46%	-11.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.06%	19.89%	-12.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.10%	19.89%	-12.79%

FCOR vs. FELG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCOR has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FELG's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCOR vs. FELG - Dividend Comparison

FCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than FELG's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCOR Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF	4.55%	4.47%	4.35%	3.70%	3.30%	2.34%	2.99%	3.10%	3.65%	2.81%	3.04%	3.82%
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	0.34%	0.38%	0.44%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCOR and FELG in my portfolio?

FCOR and FELG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCOR or FELG?

FELG has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to FCOR (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCOR dropped -22.60% vs FELG's -23.89%.

Which ETF is better, FCOR or FELG?

On 1-year performance, FELG leads with 27.58% vs 6.06% for FCOR. On fees, FELG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FCOR or FELG?

Over the 1-year period, FELG has performed better with a 27.58% return vs 6.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCOR or FELG?

FELG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCOR or FELG?

FCOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.55%, compared with 0.34% for FELG.

What is the main difference between FCOR and FELG?

FCOR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FELG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FCOR and 0.18% for FELG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FELG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.