FCOR vs. FBCG
FCOR (Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCOR is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCOR returned -0.12%/yr vs 13.15%/yr for FBCG. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FCOR charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.
Performance
FCOR vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCOR achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than FBCG's 11.42% return.
FCOR
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 5.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.12%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.79%
FBCG
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 24.47%
- 3Y*
- 26.40%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.99M | $34.97M | $38.44M | |
| $2.15M | $2.03M | $1.92M |
FCOR vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOR Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF | -0.59% | 7.88% | 3.01% | 8.95% | -15.88% | -1.64% | 7.70% |
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 11.42% | 18.60% | 39.05% | 57.98% | -39.10% | 21.34% | 41.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCOR and FBCG is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.27 |
The correlation between FCOR and FBCG shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCOR vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank
FCOR
FBCG
FCOR vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCOR | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.21 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 1.62 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.71 | 5.52 | -3.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCOR vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOR and FBCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCOR | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.60% | -43.56% | +20.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | -15.17% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.55% | -27.89% | +22.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.58% | -43.56% | +20.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.22% | -4.62% | +2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -11.31% | +6.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 4.45% | -3.30% |
Volatility
FCOR vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) is 1.24%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that FCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCOR | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 6.68% | -5.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.56% | 16.57% | -13.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.34% | 20.68% | -16.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.07% | 26.11% | -19.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.10% | 25.74% | -18.64% |
FCOR vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCOR has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCOR vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison
FCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCOR Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF | 4.67% | 4.47% | 4.35% | 3.70% | 3.30% | 2.34% | 2.99% | 3.10% | 3.65% | 2.81% | 3.04% | 3.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCOR and FBCG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBCG has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to FCOR (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCOR dropped -22.60% vs FBCG's -43.56%.
On 5-year performance, FBCG leads with 13.15% vs -0.12% for FCOR. On fees, FCOR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FBCG has performed better with a 13.15% return vs -0.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCOR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.
FCOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.
FCOR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FBCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FCOR and 0.59% for FBCG.
FBCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCOR and FBCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer