FCNVX vs. VUBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX).
FCNVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 3, 2011. VUBFX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 24, 2015.
Performance
FCNVX vs. VUBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCNVX vs. VUBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class | 0.52% | 4.51% | 5.43% | 5.86% | 0.85% | -0.06% | 1.10% | 3.00% | 1.82% | 1.42% |
VUBFX Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares | 0.59% | 5.04% | 5.99% | 5.43% | -0.53% | 0.03% | 1.95% | 3.34% | 1.94% | 1.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCNVX achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than VUBFX's 0.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCNVX having a 2.51% annualized return and VUBFX not far ahead at 2.56%.
FCNVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
VUBFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCNVX vs. VUBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCNVX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VUBFX's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FCNVX vs. VUBFX — Risk / Return Rank
FCNVX
VUBFX
FCNVX vs. VUBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCNVX | VUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.18 | 5.18 | -2.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 14.52 | 10.17 | +4.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.34 | 3.60 | +2.74 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 21.58 | 14.46 | +7.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 84.59 | 65.22 | +19.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCNVX | VUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 5.18 | -2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.69 | 3.34 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.44 | 3.07 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.17 | 3.06 | -0.89 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCNVX and VUBFX is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FCNVX vs. VUBFX - Dividend Comparison
FCNVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than VUBFX's 4.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class | 3.91% | 4.41% | 5.17% | 4.97% | 1.24% | 0.24% | 0.99% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.30% | 1.01% | 0.48% |
VUBFX Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares | 4.12% | 4.62% | 5.42% | 4.06% | 1.28% | 0.43% | 1.52% | 2.58% | 2.13% | 1.43% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCNVX vs. VUBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCNVX drawdown since its inception was -2.19%, which is greater than VUBFX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNVX and VUBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCNVX | VUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.19% | -1.86% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.20% | -0.30% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.59% | -1.86% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -2.19% | -1.86% | -0.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.10% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -0.17% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.07% | -0.02% |
Volatility
FCNVX vs. VUBFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) is 0.10%, while Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX) has a volatility of 0.34%. This indicates that FCNVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCNVX | VUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | 0.34% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.81% | 0.55% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28% | 0.84% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.27% | 0.98% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.03% | 0.84% | +0.19% |