PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUBFX vs. VBTLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUBFX vs. VBTLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUBFX achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly higher than VBTLX's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VUBFX has outperformed VBTLX with an annualized return of 2.61%, while VBTLX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.


VUBFX

1D
0.05%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.75%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
5.33%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
2.61%

VBTLX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.45%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
0.18%
10Y*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUBFX vs. VBTLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VUBFX
Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares
1.37%5.04%5.99%5.43%-0.53%0.03%1.95%3.34%1.94%1.23%
VBTLX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.42%7.17%1.26%5.74%-13.16%-1.81%7.72%8.73%-0.25%3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between VUBFX and VBTLX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.41

The correlation between VUBFX and VBTLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUBFX vs. VBTLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUBFX
VUBFX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VUBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VUBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

VBTLX
VBTLX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
VBTLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBTLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBTLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VBTLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBTLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUBFX vs. VBTLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUBFXVBTLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.71

1.27

+4.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

12.83

1.91

+10.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

4.52

1.22

+3.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

15.05

1.93

+13.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

84.72

5.84

+78.88

VUBFX vs. VBTLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUBFX Sharpe Ratio is 5.71, which is higher than the VBTLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUBFX and VBTLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUBFXVBTLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.71

1.27

+4.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.45

0.03

+3.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

3.15

0.32

+2.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.11

0.76

+2.35

Drawdowns

VUBFX vs. VBTLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUBFX drawdown since its inception was -1.86%, smaller than the maximum VBTLX drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUBFX and VBTLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUBFXVBTLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-18.81%

+16.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.30%

-2.89%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

-6.00%

+5.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.86%

-18.14%

+16.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.86%

-18.81%

+16.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.18%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-2.67%

+2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

0.96%

-0.91%

Volatility

VUBFX vs. VBTLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX) is 0.17%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that VUBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBTLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUBFXVBTLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.17%

1.38%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.54%

2.80%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78%

3.98%

-3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.99%

6.01%

-5.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.83%

4.98%

-4.15%

VUBFX vs. VBTLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUBFX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VBTLX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUBFX vs. VBTLX - Dividend Comparison

VUBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than VBTLX's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBTLX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares
3.98%3.87%3.69%3.10%2.59%1.96%2.39%2.74%2.57%2.56%2.53%2.82%
VUBFX
Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares
4.42%4.62%5.42%4.06%1.28%0.43%1.52%2.58%2.13%1.43%0.98%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUBFX and VBTLX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBTLX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to VUBFX (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUBFX dropped -1.86% vs VBTLX's -18.81%.

VUBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.71 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUBFX and VBTLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer