FCNVX vs. PRTBX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FCNVX (Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class) and PRTBX (Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, FCNVX returned 2.61%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for PRTBX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCNVX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PRTBX.

Performance

FCNVX vs. PRTBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNVX achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than PRTBX's 1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FCNVX has outperformed PRTBX with an annualized return of 2.61%, while PRTBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.29% annualized return.

FCNVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 1.82%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 1Y: 4.09%
• 3Y*: 4.96%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: 2.61%

PRTBX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.17%
• 6M: 0.99%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 1Y: 2.99%
• 3Y*: 3.87%
• 5Y*: 2.06%
• 10Y*: 1.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCNVX vs. PRTBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class	1.82%	4.51%	5.43%	5.86%	0.85%	-0.06%	1.10%	3.00%	1.82%	1.42%
PRTBX Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio	1.05%	4.19%	4.12%	3.79%	-2.28%	-0.74%	0.10%	1.76%	1.16%	0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNVX and PRTBX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2011	0.12

The correlation between FCNVX and PRTBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.30 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCNVX vs. PRTBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNVX

FCNVX Risk / Return Rank: 100
FCNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FCNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

PRTBX

PRTBX Risk / Return Rank: 99
PRTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PRTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PRTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PRTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PRTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCNVX vs. PRTBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCNVX	PRTBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.47	4.70	-1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	18.03	8.64	+9.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	8.77	2.27	+6.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	41.30	9.68	+31.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	132.04	48.57	+83.46

FCNVX vs. PRTBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is comparable to the PRTBX Sharpe Ratio of 4.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNVX and PRTBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCNVX vs. PRTBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNVX drawdown since its inception was -2.19%, smaller than the maximum PRTBX drawdown of -5.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNVX and PRTBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCNVX	PRTBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-5.13%	+2.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.10%	-0.32%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.30%	-0.44%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.59%	-3.63%	+3.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-2.19%	-4.36%	+2.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.05%	-0.95%	+0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	0.06%	-0.03%

Volatility

FCNVX vs. PRTBX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) has a higher volatility of 0.40% compared to Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX) at 0.22%. This indicates that FCNVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRTBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCNVX	PRTBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.40%	0.22%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.81%	0.45%	+0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18%	0.66%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.30%	1.21%	+0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.05%	0.87%	+0.18%

FCNVX vs. PRTBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNVX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PRTBX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCNVX vs. PRTBX - Dividend Comparison

FCNVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than PRTBX's 3.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class	4.10%	4.41%	5.17%	4.97%	1.24%	0.24%	0.99%	2.45%	2.21%	1.30%	1.01%	0.48%
PRTBX Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio	3.35%	3.39%	2.69%	1.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%	1.65%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCNVX and PRTBX in my portfolio?

FCNVX and PRTBX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCNVX or PRTBX?

FCNVX has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to PRTBX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNVX dropped -2.19% vs PRTBX's -5.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRTBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 3.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.