PRTBX vs. NVDA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).

PRTBX is managed by Permanent Portfolio. It was launched on Sep 21, 1987.

Performance

PRTBX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PRTBX vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRTBX Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio	0.35%	4.19%	4.12%	3.79%	-2.28%	-0.74%	0.10%	1.76%	1.16%	0.12%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	-6.48%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	81.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRTBX achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -6.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PRTBX has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 1.21%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.61% annualized return.

PRTBX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: 0.35%
• 6M: 1.26%
• 1Y: 3.24%
• 3Y*: 3.69%
• 5Y*: 1.88%
• 10Y*: 1.21%

NVDA

• 1D: 5.59%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: -6.48%
• 6M: -6.52%
• 1Y: 60.95%
• 3Y*: 84.54%
• 5Y*: 66.14%
• 10Y*: 69.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PRTBX vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRTBX

PRTBX Risk / Return Rank: 99
PRTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PRTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PRTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PRTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PRTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 83
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRTBX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRTBX	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.76	1.48	+2.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	6.37	2.17	+4.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.96	1.27	+0.69
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.88	2.92	+4.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	31.10	7.39	+23.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRTBX vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRTBX Sharpe Ratio is 3.76, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRTBX and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRTBX	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.76	1.48	+2.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.56	1.29	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.41	1.40	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.89	0.61	+3.28

Correlation

The correlation between PRTBX and NVDA is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

PRTBX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

PRTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRTBX Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio	3.37%	3.39%	2.69%	1.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%	1.65%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Drawdowns

PRTBX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRTBX drawdown since its inception was -5.13%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRTBX and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRTBX	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.13%	-89.72%	+84.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.44%	-20.21%	+19.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-3.81%	-66.34%	+62.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-4.36%	-66.34%	+61.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-15.76%	+15.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.96%	-36.40%	+35.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.11%	7.99%	-7.88%

Volatility

PRTBX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX) is 0.27%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 10.46%. This indicates that PRTBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRTBX	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.27%	10.46%	-10.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.41%	25.91%	-25.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88%	41.44%	-40.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.21%	51.74%	-50.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.86%	49.85%	-48.99%