PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCNVX vs. FIGB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCNVX vs. FIGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNVX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than FIGB's 0.14% return.


FCNVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
5.03%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
2.58%

FIGB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.04%
YTD
0.14%
6M
0.20%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCNVX vs. FIGB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FCNVX
Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class
1.50%4.51%5.43%5.86%0.85%-0.06%
FIGB
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF
0.14%6.95%1.51%6.65%-13.43%1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNVX and FIGB is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2021

0.24

The correlation between FCNVX and FIGB shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCNVX vs. FIGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNVX
FCNVX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FCNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

FIGB
FIGB Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FIGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIGB Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FIGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIGB Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCNVX vs. FIGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCNVXFIGBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+22.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

14.09

1.18

+12.92

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

42.87

1.45

+41.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

146.17

4.50

+141.67

FCNVX vs. FIGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.60, which is higher than the FIGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNVX and FIGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCNVXFIGBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60

1.04

+2.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.79

0.04

+2.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.20

0.07

+2.14

Drawdowns

FCNVX vs. FIGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNVX drawdown since its inception was -2.19%, smaller than the maximum FIGB drawdown of -18.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNVX and FIGB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCNVXFIGBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-18.08%

+15.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

-2.93%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

-6.17%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.59%

-18.08%

+17.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.60%

+1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-6.92%

+6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.95%

-0.92%

Volatility

FCNVX vs. FIGB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) is 0.33%, while Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that FCNVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCNVXFIGBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

1.42%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.78%

2.87%

-2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18%

4.16%

-2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.29%

6.28%

-4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.04%

6.16%

-5.12%

FCNVX vs. FIGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNVX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FIGB's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCNVX vs. FIGB - Dividend Comparison

FCNVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, which matches FIGB's 4.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNVX
Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class
4.15%4.41%5.17%4.97%1.24%0.24%0.99%2.45%2.21%1.30%1.01%0.48%
FIGB
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF
4.11%4.15%4.28%3.79%2.44%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCNVX and FIGB have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIGB has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to FCNVX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNVX dropped -2.19% vs FIGB's -18.08%.

FCNVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCNVX and FIGB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer