FIGB vs. TLT
FIGB (Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FIGB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. FIGB is actively managed, while TLT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIGB returned 0.15%/yr vs -6.59%/yr for TLT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIGB charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
FIGB vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIGB achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than TLT's 0.77% return.
FIGB
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.15%
- 10Y*
- —
TLT
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- -1.89%
- 5Y*
- -6.59%
- 10Y*
- -1.74%
FIGB vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGB Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF | 0.16% | 6.95% | 1.51% | 6.65% | -13.43% | 1.32% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 0.77% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | 7.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIGB and TLT is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between FIGB and TLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIGB vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
FIGB
TLT
FIGB vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIGB | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.07 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 0.51 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.95 | 1.22 | +2.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIGB vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIGB drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGB and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIGB | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.08% | -48.35% | +30.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -7.58% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.17% | -19.18% | +13.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.08% | -43.70% | +25.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -39.82% | +38.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.87% | -13.87% | +7.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 3.18% | -2.18% |
Volatility
FIGB vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) is 0.89%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.20%. This indicates that FIGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIGB | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 2.20% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.88% | 6.62% | -3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04% | 9.48% | -5.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.28% | 15.82% | -9.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.15% | 14.88% | -8.73% |
FIGB vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIGB has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIGB vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
FIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than TLT's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGB Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF | 4.11% | 4.15% | 4.28% | 3.79% | 2.44% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.54% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIGB and TLT have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLT has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to FIGB (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIGB dropped -18.08% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 5-year performance, FIGB leads with 0.15% vs -6.59% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FIGB has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FIGB has performed better with a 0.15% return vs -6.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FIGB.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 4.11% for FIGB.
FIGB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while TLT is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FIGB and 0.15% for TLT.
FIGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIGB and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer