FCNSX vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FCNSX (Fidelity Series Canada Fund) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both funds - FCNSX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Over the past 5 years, FCNSX returned 11.47%/yr vs 16.76%/yr for XLG. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCNSX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

FCNSX vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNSX achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 8.82% return.

FCNSX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 8.00%
• 6M: 12.57%
• 1Y: 20.95%
• 3Y*: 18.72%
• 5Y*: 11.47%
• 10Y*: —

XLG

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 5.06%
• YTD: 8.82%
• 6M: 8.60%
• 1Y: 30.80%
• 3Y*: 24.94%
• 5Y*: 16.76%
• 10Y*: 17.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCNSX vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCNSX Fidelity Series Canada Fund	8.00%	28.56%	9.88%	15.95%	-6.88%	28.62%	4.47%	27.78%	-15.01%	10.10%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	8.82%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	9.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNSX and XLG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2017	0.64

The correlation between FCNSX and XLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCNSX vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNSX

FCNSX Risk / Return Rank: 44
FCNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FCNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FCNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FCNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 62
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCNSX vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCNSX	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	2.33	-0.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	3.14	-0.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.41	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	2.55	+0.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.81	9.60	+1.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCNSX vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNSX and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCNSX	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	2.33	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.90	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.63	+0.01

Drawdowns

FCNSX vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNSX drawdown since its inception was -41.47%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNSX and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCNSX	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.47%	-52.39%	+10.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.48%	-12.41%	+4.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.13%	-20.70%	+8.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.35%	-28.02%	+6.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.88%	-0.29%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.17%	-7.64%	+2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	3.30%	-1.19%

Volatility

FCNSX vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) is 2.73%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that FCNSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCNSX	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.73%	2.92%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.97%	9.73%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.65%	13.28%	-0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.26%	18.68%	-2.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.56%	18.84%	-0.28%

FCNSX vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FCNSX vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

FCNSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than XLG's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNSX Fidelity Series Canada Fund	1.90%	2.06%	3.05%	3.42%	3.12%	2.20%	2.14%	2.24%	2.51%	1.07%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.59%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCNSX and XLG in my portfolio?

FCNSX and XLG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCNSX or XLG?

XLG has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to FCNSX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNSX dropped -41.47% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.