FCNSX vs. FBALX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FCNSX (Fidelity Series Canada Fund) and FBALX (Fidelity Balanced Fund) are both mutual funds - FCNSX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FBALX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FCNSX returned 11.30%/yr vs 9.12%/yr for FBALX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCNSX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for FBALX.

Performance

FCNSX vs. FBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNSX achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly lower than FBALX's 9.80% return.

FCNSX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -1.69%
• YTD: 5.77%
• 6M: 4.82%
• 1Y: 17.93%
• 3Y*: 18.10%
• 5Y*: 11.30%
• 10Y*: —

FBALX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: 9.80%
• 6M: 9.32%
• 1Y: 22.66%
• 3Y*: 16.25%
• 5Y*: 9.12%
• 10Y*: 11.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCNSX vs. FBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCNSX Fidelity Series Canada Fund	5.77%	28.56%	9.88%	15.95%	-6.88%	28.62%	4.47%	27.78%	-15.01%	10.10%
FBALX Fidelity Balanced Fund	9.80%	15.11%	16.09%	20.31%	-18.29%	18.27%	22.45%	24.40%	-3.98%	5.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNSX and FBALX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2017	0.73

The correlation between FCNSX and FBALX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCNSX vs. FBALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNSX

FCNSX Risk / Return Rank: 33
FCNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FCNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FCNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FCNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FCNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

FBALX

FBALX Risk / Return Rank: 85
FBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCNSX vs. FBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCNSX	FBALX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	2.58	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	3.58	-1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.49	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	3.65	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.51	17.07	-8.56

FCNSX vs. FBALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the FBALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNSX and FBALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCNSX vs. FBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNSX drawdown since its inception was -41.47%, roughly equal to the maximum FBALX drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNSX and FBALX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCNSX	FBALX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.47%	-43.57%	+2.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.48%	-6.47%	-1.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.13%	-12.88%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.35%	-22.89%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.02%	-0.51%	-2.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.15%	-4.37%	-0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	1.38%	+0.77%

Volatility

FCNSX vs. FBALX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) at 3.67%. This indicates that FCNSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCNSX	FBALX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	3.67%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.30%	7.48%	+2.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.07%	9.18%	+3.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.30%	12.26%	+4.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.53%	12.82%	+5.71%

FCNSX vs. FBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FBALX's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCNSX vs. FBALX - Dividend Comparison

FCNSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than FBALX's 5.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBALX Fidelity Balanced Fund	5.16%	5.69%	5.67%	2.28%	8.06%	9.66%	5.90%	4.24%	10.99%	7.90%	3.07%	7.70%
FCNSX Fidelity Series Canada Fund	1.94%	2.06%	3.05%	3.42%	3.12%	2.20%	2.14%	2.24%	2.51%	1.07%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCNSX and FBALX in my portfolio?

FCNSX and FBALX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCNSX or FBALX?

FCNSX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to FBALX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNSX dropped -41.47% vs FBALX's -43.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.