FCN vs. NVR
FCN (FTI Consulting, Inc.) and NVR (NVR, Inc.) are both stocks. FCN operates in Consulting Services (Industrials), while NVR operates in Residential Construction (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, FCN returned 13.86%/yr vs 13.75%/yr for NVR. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FCN vs. NVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCN achieves a -7.28% return, which is significantly higher than NVR's -14.93% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCN having a 13.86% annualized return and NVR not far behind at 13.75%.
FCN
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- 6M
- -10.41%
- YTD
- -7.28%
- 1Y
- -4.30%
- 3Y*
- -4.92%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.74%
NVR
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -8.10%
- 6M
- -19.62%
- YTD
- -14.93%
- 1Y
- -20.06%
- 3Y*
- -0.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $70.08M | $60.07M | $79.16M | |
NVR NVR, Inc. | $211.12M | $200.72M | $190.47M |
FCN vs. NVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCN FTI Consulting, Inc. | -7.28% | -10.62% | -4.03% | 25.41% | 3.51% | 37.33% | 0.96% | 66.06% | 55.12% | -4.70% |
NVR NVR, Inc. | -14.93% | -10.83% | 16.83% | 51.77% | -21.94% | 44.83% | 7.13% | 56.28% | -30.53% | 110.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCN and NVR is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 1996 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
FCN:
$4.37B
NVR:
$16.76B
FCN:
$10.72
NVR:
$475.22
FCN:
14.78
NVR:
13.06
FCN:
3.22
NVR:
1.27
FCN:
0.95
NVR:
1.98
FCN:
$3.92B
NVR:
$9.33B
FCN:
$1.25B
NVR:
$2.00B
FCN:
$422.82M
NVR:
$1.50B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCN vs. NVR — Risk / Return Rank
FCN
NVR
FCN vs. NVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and NVR, Inc. (NVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCN | NVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.89 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | -0.58 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | -1.11 | +0.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCN vs. NVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCN drawdown since its inception was -88.02%, smaller than the maximum NVR drawdown of -96.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCN and NVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCN | NVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.02% | -96.72% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.93% | -34.88% | +9.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.22% | -43.94% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.22% | -43.94% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.22% | -46.13% | +6.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.43% | -37.49% | +6.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.31% | -24.22% | -6.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.79% | 18.07% | -8.28% |
Volatility
FCN vs. NVR - Volatility Comparison
FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and NVR, Inc. (NVR) have volatilities of 9.27% and 9.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCN | NVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.27% | 9.63% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.07% | 22.52% | +2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.47% | 27.61% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 27.86% | +1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.69% | 32.17% | -1.48% |
Dividends
FCN vs. NVR - Dividend Comparison
Neither FCN nor NVR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FCN vs. NVR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTI Consulting, Inc. and NVR, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FCN vs. NVR - Profitability Comparison
FCN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a gross profit of 316.27M and revenue of 993.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.8%.
NVR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVR, Inc. reported a gross profit of 392.37M and revenue of 2.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.6%.
FCN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported an operating income of 85.56M and revenue of 993.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.
NVR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVR, Inc. reported an operating income of 264.78M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
FCN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a net income of 57.81M and revenue of 993.46M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.
NVR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVR, Inc. reported a net income of 507.49M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in a net margin of 22.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FCN and NVR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVR has higher volatility (9.63%) compared to FCN (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCN dropped -88.02% vs NVR's -96.72%.
FCN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCN and NVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer