FCLO vs. ENOR
FCLO (Fidelity CLO ETF) and ENOR (iShares MSCI Norway ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Fidelity, while ENOR is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. FCLO is actively managed, while ENOR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.29, they often move in opposite directions. FCLO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for ENOR.
Performance
FCLO vs. ENOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FCLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENOR
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 28.21%
- 6M
- 33.17%
- 1Y
- 37.30%
- 3Y*
- 23.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.41%
FCLO vs. ENOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FCLO Fidelity CLO ETF | 1.70% |
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF | 11.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLO and ENOR is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026 | -0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCLO vs. ENOR — Risk / Return Rank
FCLO
ENOR
FCLO vs. ENOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity CLO ETF (FCLO) and iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCLO | ENOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.96 | 0.25 | +3.71 |
Drawdowns
FCLO vs. ENOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLO drawdown since its inception was -0.58%, smaller than the maximum ENOR drawdown of -55.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLO and ENOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLO | ENOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -55.35% | +54.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.15% | +3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -16.58% | +16.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.18% | — |
Volatility
FCLO vs. ENOR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCLO | ENOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46% | 17.43% | -15.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 22.18% | -20.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 24.02% | -22.56% |
FCLO vs. ENOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ENOR's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCLO vs. ENOR - Dividend Comparison
FCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than ENOR's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF | 2.31% | 2.96% | 6.32% | 5.06% | 4.02% | 2.24% | 2.39% | 3.15% | 2.79% | 2.47% | 2.96% | 3.24% |
FCLO Fidelity CLO ETF | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCLO and ENOR have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCLO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCLO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for ENOR.
ENOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.56% for FCLO.
FCLO is categorized as CLO, while ENOR is Europe Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCLO and 0.53% for ENOR.
Find the right allocation for FCLO and ENOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer