FCLD vs. GXPT
FCLD (Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - FCLD tracks the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCLD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.
Performance
FCLD vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCLD achieves a 24.92% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 16.02% return.
FCLD
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 24.92%
- 6M
- 23.38%
- 1Y
- 32.25%
- 3Y*
- 25.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPT
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 16.02%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCLD vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 24.92% | 3.87% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 16.02% | 11.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLD and GXPT is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCLD vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank
FCLD
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FCLD vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCLD | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.63 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCLD vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLD drawdown since its inception was -50.85%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLD and GXPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLD | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.85% | -18.74% | -32.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.88% | -9.37% | -1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.35% | -5.06% | -15.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | — | — |
Volatility
FCLD vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCLD | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.38% | 22.88% | +5.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.54% | 22.88% | +7.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.54% | 22.88% | +7.66% |
FCLD vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCLD vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison
FCLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than GXPT's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.13% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCLD and GXPT have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FCLD.
GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.01% for FCLD.
FCLD tracks Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FCLD and 0.15% for GXPT.
Find the right allocation for FCLD and GXPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer