FCGSX vs. CMBT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) and Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT).

FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.

Performance

FCGSX vs. CMBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) and Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FCGSX vs. CMBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	-2.49%	25.52%	38.00%	45.97%	-32.15%	25.13%	70.01%	39.75%	-4.03%	37.69%
CMBT Cmb.Tech NV	31.76%	-2.30%	-35.19%	17.73%	93.21%	12.61%	-24.34%	83.37%	-24.03%	20.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCGSX achieves a -2.49% return, which is significantly lower than CMBT's 31.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FCGSX has outperformed CMBT with an annualized return of 21.96%, while CMBT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.57% annualized return.

FCGSX

• 1D: 4.44%
• 1M: -4.59%
• YTD: -2.49%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 38.78%
• 3Y*: 28.90%
• 5Y*: 14.89%
• 10Y*: 21.96%

CMBT

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: -14.06%
• YTD: 31.76%
• 6M: 36.87%
• 1Y: 38.95%
• 3Y*: -0.16%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 9.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FCGSX vs. CMBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCGSX

FCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CMBT

CMBT Risk / Return Rank: 72
CMBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CMBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CMBT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CMBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
CMBT Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCGSX vs. CMBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) and Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCGSX	CMBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	0.96	+0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	1.56	+0.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.18	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	2.01	+0.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.43	4.93	+8.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCGSX vs. CMBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the CMBT Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCGSX and CMBT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCGSX	CMBT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	0.96	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.31	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95	0.23	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.18	+0.70

Correlation

The correlation between FCGSX and CMBT is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FCGSX vs. CMBT - Dividend Comparison

FCGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.74%, more than CMBT's 0.79% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	10.74%	10.48%	12.49%	3.13%	0.61%	38.65%	31.99%	11.06%	13.21%	10.51%	2.44%	0.25%
CMBT Cmb.Tech NV	0.79%	0.52%	25.18%	12.23%	0.70%	1.35%	20.75%	0.96%	1.73%	3.03%	17.23%	6.35%

Drawdowns

FCGSX vs. CMBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCGSX drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, smaller than the maximum CMBT drawdown of -57.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGSX and CMBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCGSX	CMBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.77%	-57.21%	+18.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.10%	-19.70%	+6.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.77%	-57.21%	+18.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.77%	-57.21%	+18.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.44%	-30.41%	+23.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.05%	-25.31%	+18.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	8.02%	-5.11%

Volatility

FCGSX vs. CMBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) is 8.15%, while Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT) has a volatility of 12.29%. This indicates that FCGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCGSX	CMBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.15%	12.29%	-4.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.39%	27.91%	-13.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.14%	42.87%	-18.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.69%	42.58%	-18.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.19%	40.86%	-17.67%