UNG vs. COMT

In the year-to-date period, UNG achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly higher than COMT's -1.03% return. Over the past 10 years, UNG has underperformed COMT with an annualized return of -23.17%, while COMT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.62% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UNG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current UNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is higher than the COMT Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNG and COMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

UNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%.

The maximum UNG drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than COMT's maximum drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNG and COMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a higher volatility of 15.43% compared to iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) at 4.57%. This indicates that UNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.