FCFY vs. SCHV
FCFY (First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - FCFY tracks the S&P 500 Sector-Neutral FCF Index - Benchmark TR Gross while SCHV tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FCFY returned 20.70% vs 28.49% for SCHV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCFY charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.
Performance
FCFY vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCFY achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 15.39% return.
FCFY
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 5.88%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 4.54%
- 1Y
- 20.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
FCFY vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF | 3.09% | 16.76% | 11.28% | 11.06% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 15.39% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 7.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCFY and SCHV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FCFY and SCHV shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FCFY vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCFY
SCHV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FCFY
SCHV
Financial Services
FCFY
SCHV
Communication Services
FCFY
SCHV
Healthcare
FCFY
SCHV
Consumer Cyclical
FCFY
SCHV
Industrials
FCFY
SCHV
Consumer Defensive
FCFY
SCHV
Energy
FCFY
SCHV
Utilities
FCFY
SCHV
Real Estate
FCFY
SCHV
Basic Materials
FCFY
SCHV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCFY vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
FCFY
SCHV
FCFY vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCFY | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.48 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 4.19 | -2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.64 | 16.96 | -12.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCFY | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 2.69 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.72 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
FCFY vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCFY drawdown since its inception was -21.36%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFY and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCFY | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.36% | -37.08% | +15.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -6.83% | -5.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | 0.00% | -2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -3.83% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 1.69% | +2.78% |
Volatility
FCFY vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) at 3.09%. This indicates that FCFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCFY | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 3.09% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.29% | 8.13% | +3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 10.63% | +5.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 14.51% | +3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 16.94% | +0.60% |
FCFY vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCFY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCFY vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
FCFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than SCHV's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.43% | 1.48% | 1.76% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.76% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCFY and SCHV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCFY has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to SCHV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFY dropped -21.36% vs SCHV's -37.08%.
On 1-year performance, SCHV leads with 28.49% vs 20.70% for FCFY. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 28.49% return vs 20.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FCFY.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.43% for FCFY.
FCFY tracks S&P 500 Sector-Neutral FCF Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FCFY and 0.04% for SCHV.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCFY and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer