FCFY vs. LVDS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS).

FCFY and LVDS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCFY is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Sector-Neutral FCF Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Aug 22, 2023. LVDS is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Jul 14, 2025.

Performance

FCFY vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FCFY vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF	-7.82%	9.16%
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	2.47%	7.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFY achieves a -7.82% return, which is significantly lower than LVDS's 2.47% return.

FCFY

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -4.27%
• YTD: -7.82%
• 6M: -4.66%
• 1Y: 11.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LVDS

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -4.12%
• YTD: 2.47%
• 6M: 6.29%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFY vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.

FCFY

First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF

LVDS

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF

Return for Risk

FCFY vs. LVDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFY

FCFY Risk / Return Rank: 27
FCFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FCFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FCFY Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FCFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FCFY Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFY vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCFY	LVDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.39	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCFY	LVDS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	1.37	-0.71

Correlation

The correlation between FCFY and LVDS is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FCFY vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison

FCFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than LVDS's 8.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF	1.60%	1.48%	1.76%	0.73%
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	8.38%	8.25%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FCFY vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFY drawdown since its inception was -21.36%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFY and LVDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCFY	LVDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.36%	-6.64%	-14.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.19%	-4.41%	-5.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.39%	-1.06%	-2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FCFY	LVDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.14%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.62%	10.28%	+12.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.69%	10.28%	+7.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.69%	10.28%	+7.41%