PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCEUX vs. MUHLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCEUX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEUX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCEUX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FCEUX
Franklin U.S. Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
-4.21%18.76%31.47%22.29%-14.71%31.00%19.13%7.05%
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
9.11%17.82%3.38%13.92%2.89%28.98%11.96%6.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCEUX achieves a -4.21% return, which is significantly lower than MUHLX's 9.11% return.


FCEUX

1D
3.05%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
-4.21%
6M
-0.99%
1Y
18.86%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*

MUHLX

1D
2.42%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
9.11%
6M
10.37%
1Y
22.96%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
12.05%
10Y*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCEUX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCEUX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FCEUX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCEUX
FCEUX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FCEUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCEUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCEUX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FCEUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCEUX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

MUHLX
MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCEUX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEUX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCEUXMUHLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.42

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

1.97

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

2.37

-0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.22

8.57

-0.35

FCEUX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCEUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCEUX and MUHLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCEUXMUHLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.42

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.82

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.51

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between FCEUX and MUHLX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FCEUX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

FCEUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than MUHLX's 3.06% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCEUX
Franklin U.S. Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
3.80%3.64%8.90%1.45%8.08%8.52%2.20%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
3.06%3.34%0.58%0.89%6.80%7.77%10.28%1.26%14.70%4.30%0.00%11.02%

Drawdowns

FCEUX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCEUX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, smaller than the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEUX and MUHLX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FCEUXMUHLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-62.05%

+28.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-10.23%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.03%

-18.63%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.69%

-5.65%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-10.81%

+5.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.83%

-0.39%

Volatility

FCEUX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEUX) is 5.46%, while Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that FCEUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUHLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FCEUXMUHLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

6.01%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

12.06%

-2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.84%

16.85%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

14.77%

+1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.95%

17.04%

+2.91%