PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCEUX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCEUX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEUX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCEUX achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.35% return.


FCEUX

1D
0.00%
1M
4.33%
YTD
9.21%
6M
9.95%
1Y
27.70%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
15.30%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.90%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.28%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCEUX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FCEUX
Franklin U.S. Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
9.21%18.76%31.47%22.29%-14.71%31.00%19.13%7.05%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.35%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FCEUX and ^GSPC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.98

The correlation between FCEUX and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCEUX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCEUX
FCEUX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FCEUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCEUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCEUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FCEUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCEUX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCEUX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEUX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCEUX^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.41

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

2.93

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.96

13.52

+2.44

FCEUX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCEUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCEUX and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCEUX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.24

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.73

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.47

+0.43

Drawdowns

FCEUX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCEUX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEUX and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCEUX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-56.78%

+23.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-9.10%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.77%

-18.90%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.03%

-25.43%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.74%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-10.72%

+5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.97%

-0.19%

Volatility

FCEUX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEUX) is 2.67%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that FCEUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCEUX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

2.93%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

8.99%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.00%

11.89%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

16.90%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

18.06%

+1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FCEUX and ^GSPC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

^GSPC has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to FCEUX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCEUX dropped -33.57% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

FCEUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCEUX and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer