PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCEUX vs. NWAUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCEUX vs. NWAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEUX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCEUX vs. NWAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FCEUX
Franklin U.S. Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
-7.05%18.76%31.47%22.29%-14.71%26.56%
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
9.70%-4.92%27.90%18.30%-3.23%22.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCEUX achieves a -7.05% return, which is significantly lower than NWAUX's 9.70% return.


FCEUX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-7.56%
YTD
-7.05%
6M
-3.58%
1Y
15.83%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*

NWAUX

1D
0.74%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
9.70%
6M
7.83%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCEUX vs. NWAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCEUX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NWAUX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FCEUX vs. NWAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCEUX
FCEUX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FCEUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCEUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCEUX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FCEUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCEUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

NWAUX
NWAUX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NWAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NWAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCEUX vs. NWAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEUX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCEUXNWAUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.49

+0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

0.73

+0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.10

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

0.58

+0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.93

1.36

+4.57

FCEUX vs. NWAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCEUX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the NWAUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCEUX and NWAUX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCEUXNWAUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.49

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.79

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.83

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between FCEUX and NWAUX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FCEUX vs. NWAUX - Dividend Comparison

FCEUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than NWAUX's 4.69% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
FCEUX
Franklin U.S. Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
3.92%3.64%8.90%1.45%8.08%8.52%2.20%0.39%
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
4.69%4.35%13.58%0.40%1.93%0.60%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FCEUX vs. NWAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCEUX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, which is greater than NWAUX's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEUX and NWAUX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FCEUXNWAUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-21.07%

-12.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-8.87%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.03%

-21.07%

-1.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.48%

-7.03%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-6.85%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

3.83%

-1.42%

Volatility

FCEUX vs. NWAUX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEUX) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) at 2.74%. This indicates that FCEUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FCEUXNWAUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

2.74%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

7.29%

+2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.62%

12.58%

+5.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.43%

16.10%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.92%

16.05%

+3.87%