FCEL vs. NBIS
FCEL (FuelCell Energy, Inc.) and NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) are both stocks. FCEL operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past year, FCEL returned 306.67% vs 273.61% for NBIS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FCEL vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCEL achieves a 192.07% return, which is significantly higher than NBIS's 131.87% return.
FCEL
- 1D
- 11.90%
- 1M
- 26.03%
- 6M
- 183.91%
- YTD
- 192.07%
- 1Y
- 306.67%
- 3Y*
- -31.46%
- 5Y*
- -36.59%
- 10Y*
- -36.13%
NBIS
- 1D
- -7.80%
- 1M
- -16.47%
- 6M
- 84.09%
- YTD
- 131.87%
- 1Y
- 273.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCEL vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FCEL FuelCell Energy, Inc. | 192.07% | -19.14% | -5.83% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 131.87% | 202.18% | 46.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCEL and NBIS is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
FCEL:
$1.13B
NBIS:
$46.58B
FCEL:
-$5.47
NBIS:
$3.08
FCEL:
5.18
NBIS:
59.97
FCEL:
1.61
NBIS:
8.28
FCEL:
$167.88M
NBIS:
$877.90M
FCEL:
-$30.55M
NBIS:
$420.60M
FCEL:
-$186.85M
NBIS:
-$52.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCEL vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank
FCEL
NBIS
FCEL vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCEL | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.50 | 6.06 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.10 | 13.53 | -2.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCEL vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCEL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEL and NBIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCEL | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -58.27% | -41.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.51% | -45.47% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -32.30% | -67.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.89% | -18.74% | -65.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.78% | 20.32% | +7.46% |
Volatility
FCEL vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison
FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL) has a higher volatility of 55.74% compared to Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) at 32.81%. This indicates that FCEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCEL | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.74% | 32.81% | +22.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 102.09% | 74.81% | +27.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 129.97% | 106.95% | +23.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 100.61% | 110.32% | -9.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 124.02% | 110.32% | +13.70% |
Dividends
FCEL vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison
Neither FCEL nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FCEL vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FCEL and NBIS have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCEL has higher volatility (55.74%) compared to NBIS (32.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCEL dropped -100.00% vs NBIS's -58.27%.
NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCEL and NBIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer