PortfoliosLab logo
FCEL vs. BLK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FCEL and BLK is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FCEL vs. BLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL) and BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%2,000.00%4,000.00%6,000.00%8,000.00%10,000.00%12,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-99.98%
10,701.23%
FCEL
BLK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FCEL:

-0.78

BLK:

0.77

Sortino Ratio

FCEL:

-1.74

BLK:

1.25

Omega Ratio

FCEL:

0.82

BLK:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

FCEL:

-0.82

BLK:

0.88

Martin Ratio

FCEL:

-1.29

BLK:

2.83

Ulcer Index

FCEL:

63.56%

BLK:

7.41%

Daily Std Dev

FCEL:

103.80%

BLK:

25.86%

Max Drawdown

FCEL:

-100.00%

BLK:

-60.36%

Current Drawdown

FCEL:

-100.00%

BLK:

-13.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FCEL:

$91.58M

BLK:

$142.70B

EPS

FCEL:

-$7.88

BLK:

$41.15

PEG Ratio

FCEL:

-0.12

BLK:

1.98

PS Ratio

FCEL:

0.75

BLK:

6.81

PB Ratio

FCEL:

0.14

BLK:

3.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

FCEL:

$92.02M

BLK:

$21.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FCEL:

-$22.32M

BLK:

$14.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

FCEL:

-$71.41M

BLK:

$8.00B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCEL achieves a -52.65% return, which is significantly lower than BLK's -9.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FCEL has underperformed BLK with an annualized return of -51.12%, while BLK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.57% annualized return.


FCEL

YTD

-52.65%

1M

5.94%

6M

-42.93%

1Y

-80.72%

5Y*

-41.67%

10Y*

-51.12%

BLK

YTD

-9.43%

1M

2.94%

6M

-10.22%

1Y

19.73%

5Y*

15.96%

10Y*

12.57%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCEL vs. BLK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCEL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCEL is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCEL is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCEL is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCEL is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCEL is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCEL is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

BLK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLK is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLK is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLK is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLK is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLK is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLK is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FCEL vs. BLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL) and BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FCEL Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the BLK Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCEL and BLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.78
0.77
FCEL
BLK

Dividends

FCEL vs. BLK - Dividend Comparison

FCEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FCEL
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.
2.22%1.99%2.46%2.75%1.80%2.01%2.63%3.06%1.95%2.41%2.56%2.16%

Drawdowns

FCEL vs. BLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCEL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BLK's maximum drawdown of -60.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEL and BLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-100.00%
-13.67%
FCEL
BLK

Volatility

FCEL vs. BLK - Volatility Comparison

FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL) has a higher volatility of 16.00% compared to BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) at 8.50%. This indicates that FCEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
16.00%
8.50%
FCEL
BLK

Financials

FCEL vs. BLK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
19.00M
5.28B
(FCEL) Total Revenue
(BLK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items