PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FCEL vs. BLK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FCELBLK
YTD Return-48.14%0.11%
1Y Return-64.84%27.59%
3Y Return (Ann)-52.96%0.87%
5Y Return (Ann)-5.49%15.83%
10Y Return (Ann)-44.82%13.31%
Sharpe Ratio-0.761.54
Daily Std Dev83.17%20.14%
Max Drawdown-100.00%-60.36%
Current Drawdown-99.99%-11.07%

Fundamentals


FCELBLK
Market Cap$315.94M$118.39B
EPS-$0.26$39.36
PE Ratio8.7720.24
PEG Ratio-0.122.46
Revenue (TTM)$103.01M$18.34B
Gross Profit (TTM)-$8.16M$8.79B
EBITDA (TTM)-$125.16M$7.06B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between FCEL and BLK is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FCEL vs. BLK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FCEL achieves a -48.14% return, which is significantly lower than BLK's 0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FCEL has underperformed BLK with an annualized return of -44.82%, while BLK has yielded a comparatively higher 13.31% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2,000.00%4,000.00%6,000.00%8,000.00%10,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-99.88%
9,134.14%
FCEL
BLK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FuelCell Energy, Inc.

BlackRock, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCEL vs. BLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL) and BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCEL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FCEL, currently valued at -0.76, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FCEL, currently valued at -1.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FCEL, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.88
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FCEL, currently valued at -0.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.63
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FCEL, currently valued at -1.25, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.25
BLK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BLK, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.54
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BLK, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BLK, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BLK, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.89
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BLK, currently valued at 4.04, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.004.04

FCEL vs. BLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCEL Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the BLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of FCEL and BLK.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.76
1.54
FCEL
BLK

Dividends

FCEL vs. BLK - Dividend Comparison

FCEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FCEL
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.
2.49%2.46%2.75%1.80%2.01%2.63%3.06%1.95%2.41%2.56%2.16%2.12%

Drawdowns

FCEL vs. BLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCEL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BLK's maximum drawdown of -60.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEL and BLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-99.99%
-11.07%
FCEL
BLK

Volatility

FCEL vs. BLK - Volatility Comparison

FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL) has a higher volatility of 33.67% compared to BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) at 4.19%. This indicates that FCEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
33.67%
4.19%
FCEL
BLK

Financials

FCEL vs. BLK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items