FCBR.L vs. HACK

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK).

FCBR.L and HACK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCBR.L is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on May 27, 2020. HACK is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. It was launched on Nov 11, 2014. Both FCBR.L and HACK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FCBR.L vs. HACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FCBR.L vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FCBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation	-12.23%	-0.06%	20.93%	33.00%	-18.86%	21.41%	27.00%
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF	-3.66%	0.28%	25.65%	30.57%	-19.61%	8.04%	16.19%

Different Trading Currencies

FCBR.L is traded in GBp, while HACK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HACK values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBR.L achieves a -12.23% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's -3.66% return.

FCBR.L

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: -12.23%
• 6M: -16.93%
• 1Y: -5.77%
• 3Y*: 9.44%
• 5Y*: 8.01%
• 10Y*: —

HACK

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: 3.14%
• YTD: -3.66%
• 6M: -11.00%
• 1Y: 2.70%
• 3Y*: 14.18%
• 5Y*: 7.58%
• 10Y*: 13.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCBR.L vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FCBR.L and HACK have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

FCBR.L

First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation

HACK

ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF

Return for Risk

FCBR.L vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCBR.L

FCBR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7
FCBR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FCBR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FCBR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FCBR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FCBR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6

HACK

HACK Risk / Return Rank: 17
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCBR.L vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCBR.L	HACK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.25	0.10	-0.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.19	0.33	-0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.04	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.27	0.16	-0.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.72	0.42	-1.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCBR.L vs. HACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBR.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the HACK Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBR.L and HACK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCBR.L	HACK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25	0.10	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.34	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.54	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between FCBR.L and HACK is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FCBR.L vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison

FCBR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FCBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF	0.08%	0.07%	0.14%	0.20%	0.24%	0.26%	1.11%	0.14%	0.09%	0.01%	1.23%

Drawdowns

FCBR.L vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBR.L drawdown since its inception was -26.10%, smaller than the maximum HACK drawdown of -37.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBR.L and HACK.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCBR.L	HACK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.10%	-42.68%	+16.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.29%	-20.67%	-3.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.10%	-38.68%	+12.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.44%	-14.52%	-6.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.95%	-11.70%	+2.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.14%	7.81%	+1.33%

Volatility

FCBR.L vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) is 6.04%, while ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that FCBR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCBR.L	HACK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.04%	7.67%	-1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.92%	16.82%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.12%	25.90%	-2.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.99%	22.31%	-0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.17%	22.64%	-0.47%