FCAZX vs. QBDSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX).
FCAZX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Aug 14, 2003. QBDSX is managed by Advisors Preferred. It was launched on Aug 8, 2013.
Performance
FCAZX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCAZX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAZX Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund | -5.44% | 14.61% | 16.27% | 25.65% | -20.52% | 16.05% | 18.51% | 26.08% | -6.87% | 19.10% |
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund | -0.38% | 5.11% | 1.02% | 2.25% | -4.09% | -0.66% | -9.22% | 10.50% | -3.17% | 5.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCAZX achieves a -5.44% return, which is significantly lower than QBDSX's -0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAZX has outperformed QBDSX with an annualized return of 10.12%, while QBDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.87% annualized return.
FCAZX
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- -5.44%
- 6M
- -4.05%
- 1Y
- 11.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
QBDSX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- -1.53%
- 1Y
- 2.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- 0.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCAZX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCAZX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCAZX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank
FCAZX
QBDSX
FCAZX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCAZX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 0.60 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 0.87 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.11 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 0.89 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 3.43 | +0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCAZX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 0.60 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.21 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.17 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.15 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCAZX and QBDSX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FCAZX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison
FCAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, more than QBDSX's 4.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAZX Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund | 7.95% | 7.51% | 7.25% | 4.44% | 8.39% | 3.94% | 7.30% | 8.49% | 6.14% | 3.09% | 4.63% | 5.17% |
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund | 4.49% | 4.47% | 3.98% | 4.51% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 0.87% | 2.26% | 2.04% | 2.51% | 1.00% | 3.89% |
Drawdowns
FCAZX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCAZX drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAZX and QBDSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCAZX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -18.38% | -14.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.85% | -3.09% | -8.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.53% | -7.40% | -22.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.73% | -18.38% | -14.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.26% | -8.41% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -6.83% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 0.80% | +2.12% |
Volatility
FCAZX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 1.40%. This indicates that FCAZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCAZX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 1.40% | +4.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 2.77% | +7.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.44% | 3.77% | +13.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 4.32% | +12.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 5.26% | +11.55% |