PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCASX vs. ASFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCASX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C (FCASX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FCASX having a 11.45% return and ASFYX slightly lower at 11.24%. Over the past 10 years, FCASX has outperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 9.16%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.59% annualized return.


FCASX

1D
1.21%
1M
2.07%
YTD
11.45%
6M
11.52%
1Y
24.83%
3Y*
14.52%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
9.16%

ASFYX

1D
0.47%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
11.24%
6M
10.85%
1Y
23.30%
3Y*
-2.79%
5Y*
3.10%
10Y*
2.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCASX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCASX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C
11.45%17.02%9.64%15.21%-17.67%12.74%15.96%21.50%-8.63%17.32%
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
11.24%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%8.99%-12.59%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FCASX and ASFYX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2010

0.23

Over the past year, FCASX and ASFYX have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.23, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCASX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCASX
FCASX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FCASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCASX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FCASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCASX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCASX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C (FCASX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCASXASFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.34

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

4.22

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.13

13.32

-0.20

FCASX vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCASX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCASX and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCASX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCASX drawdown since its inception was -31.48%, smaller than the maximum ASFYX drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCASX and ASFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCASXASFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.48%

-36.43%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-5.43%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.91%

-30.32%

+17.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.31%

-36.43%

+12.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.25%

-36.43%

+9.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-21.07%

+21.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-13.20%

+8.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.71%

+0.16%

Volatility

FCASX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C (FCASX) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) at 3.67%. This indicates that FCASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCASXASFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

3.67%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

9.86%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.08%

12.03%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.40%

13.77%

-1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.69%

12.73%

-0.04%

FCASX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCASX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCASX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

FCASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than ASFYX's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.37%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
FCASX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C
5.54%6.18%3.48%0.65%5.52%1.62%1.22%4.03%5.09%2.76%0.20%4.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCASX and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCASX has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to ASFYX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCASX dropped -31.48% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

FCASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCASX and ASFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer