FCAL vs. UXRP
FCAL (First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF) and UXRP (ProShares Ultra XRP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCAL is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust, while UXRP is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg XRP Index. FCAL is actively managed, while UXRP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. FCAL charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.67%/yr for UXRP.
Performance
FCAL vs. UXRP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCAL achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly higher than UXRP's -69.48% return.
FCAL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- 7.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.81%
- 10Y*
- —
UXRP
- 1D
- -2.95%
- 1M
- -29.00%
- YTD
- -69.48%
- 6M
- -79.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCAL vs. UXRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FCAL First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF | 1.89% | 4.90% |
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | -69.48% | -76.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCAL and UXRP is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCAL vs. UXRP — Risk / Return Rank
FCAL
UXRP
FCAL vs. UXRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF (FCAL) and ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCAL | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCAL | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | -0.64 | +1.14 |
Drawdowns
FCAL vs. UXRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCAL drawdown since its inception was -14.81%, smaller than the maximum UXRP drawdown of -95.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAL and UXRP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCAL | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -95.16% | +80.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -95.16% | +94.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -71.50% | +68.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | — | — |
Volatility
FCAL vs. UXRP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCAL | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72% | 148.11% | -145.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 148.11% | -143.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.25% | 148.11% | -142.86% |
FCAL vs. UXRP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than UXRP's 1.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCAL vs. UXRP - Dividend Comparison
FCAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than UXRP's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAL First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF | 3.32% | 3.22% | 2.99% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.03% | 2.11% | 2.68% | 2.99% | 1.30% |
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCAL and UXRP have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.67% for UXRP.
FCAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.01% for UXRP.
FCAL is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while UXRP is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FCAL and 1.67% for UXRP.
Find the right allocation for FCAL and UXRP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer