FCAL vs. CMF
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF (FCAL) and iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF).
FCAL and CMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCAL is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Jun 20, 2017. CMF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2007.
Performance
FCAL vs. CMF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCAL vs. CMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAL First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF | 0.00% | 3.19% | 1.90% | 6.08% | -9.50% | 3.26% | 3.51% | 9.32% | 0.31% | 4.41% |
CMF iShares California Muni Bond ETF | -0.57% | 3.36% | 1.65% | 5.71% | -8.27% | 0.78% | 4.50% | 6.94% | 0.99% | 1.28% |
Returns By Period
FCAL
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 2.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- —
CMF
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCAL vs. CMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CMF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCAL vs. CMF — Risk / Return Rank
FCAL
CMF
FCAL vs. CMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF (FCAL) and iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCAL | CMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 0.92 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 1.15 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 1.13 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | 3.54 | -0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCAL | CMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 0.92 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.14 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.39 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCAL and CMF is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCAL vs. CMF - Dividend Comparison
FCAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than CMF's 2.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAL First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF | 3.32% | 3.22% | 2.99% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.03% | 2.11% | 2.68% | 2.99% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMF iShares California Muni Bond ETF | 2.98% | 2.94% | 2.78% | 2.29% | 1.91% | 1.58% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.17% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 2.55% |
Drawdowns
FCAL vs. CMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCAL drawdown since its inception was -14.81%, smaller than the maximum CMF drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAL and CMF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCAL | CMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -16.45% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.30% | -3.84% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.44% | -12.45% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -2.42% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.40% | -4.80% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.23% | +0.32% |
Volatility
FCAL vs. CMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF (FCAL) is 1.48%, while iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) has a volatility of 1.56%. This indicates that FCAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCAL | CMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 1.56% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.90% | 2.00% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.49% | 4.48% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 4.17% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.29% | 5.07% | +0.22% |