FCAL vs. VTEB
FCAL (First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF) and VTEB (Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. FCAL is actively managed, while VTEB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCAL returned 0.23%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for VTEB. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FCAL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTEB.
Performance
FCAL vs. VTEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCAL achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than VTEB's 0.31% return.
FCAL
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 5.33%
- 3Y*
- 3.06%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.42%
VTEB
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 2.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- 1.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $639.26K | $623.11K | $916.60K | |
| $377.87M | $352.76M | $360.69M |
FCAL vs. VTEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAL First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF | 0.60% | 3.19% | 1.90% | 6.08% | -9.50% | 3.26% | 3.51% | 9.32% | 0.31% | 4.38% |
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.31% | 3.72% | 1.31% | 6.15% | -7.99% | 1.14% | 5.19% | 7.35% | 1.04% | 1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCAL and VTEB is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 0.54 |
The correlation between FCAL and VTEB shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCAL vs. VTEB — Risk / Return Rank
FCAL
VTEB
FCAL vs. VTEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF (FCAL) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCAL | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.41 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 2.00 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.69 | 6.62 | +1.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCAL vs. VTEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCAL drawdown since its inception was -14.81%, smaller than the maximum VTEB drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAL and VTEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCAL | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -17.00% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.57% | -2.71% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.46% | -4.76% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.28% | -12.59% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -1.86% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -2.30% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 0.82% | -0.07% |
Volatility
FCAL vs. VTEB - Volatility Comparison
First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF (FCAL) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB) at 0.88%. This indicates that FCAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCAL | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 0.88% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.32% | 2.22% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82% | 2.79% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.25% | 3.92% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.22% | 5.25% | -0.03% |
FCAL vs. VTEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCAL vs. VTEB - Dividend Comparison
FCAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, which matches VTEB's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAL First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF | 3.43% | 3.22% | 2.99% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.03% | 2.11% | 2.68% | 2.99% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.14% | 3.29% | 3.14% | 2.79% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 2.30% | 2.25% | 1.96% | 1.66% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCAL and VTEB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCAL has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to VTEB (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAL dropped -14.81% vs VTEB's -17.00%.
On 5-year performance, VTEB leads with 0.53% vs 0.23% for FCAL. On fees, VTEB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTEB has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VTEB has performed better with a 0.53% return vs 0.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTEB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FCAL.
FCAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 3.14% for VTEB.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FCAL and 0.03% for VTEB.
FCAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCAL and VTEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer