FCAL vs. MKTN
FCAL (First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF) and MKTN (Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCAL is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust, while MKTN is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Federated Hermes. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
FCAL vs. MKTN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCAL achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly higher than MKTN's 0.57% return.
FCAL
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 6.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.50%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- —
MKTN
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCAL vs. MKTN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FCAL First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF | 2.15% | 2.09% |
MKTN Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF | 0.57% | 3.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCAL and MKTN is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCAL vs. MKTN — Risk / Return Rank
FCAL
MKTN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FCAL vs. MKTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF (FCAL) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF (MKTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCAL | MKTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCAL vs. MKTN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCAL drawdown since its inception was -14.81%, which is greater than MKTN's maximum drawdown of -4.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAL and MKTN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCAL | MKTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -4.13% | -10.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.34% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -1.20% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | — | — |
Volatility
FCAL vs. MKTN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCAL | MKTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67% | 6.74% | -4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.24% | 6.74% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.23% | 6.74% | -1.51% |
Dividends
FCAL vs. MKTN - Dividend Comparison
FCAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than MKTN's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAL First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF | 3.32% | 3.22% | 2.99% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.03% | 2.11% | 2.68% | 2.99% | 1.30% |
MKTN Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCAL and MKTN have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.51% for MKTN.
FCAL is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while MKTN is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Federated Hermes.
Find the right allocation for FCAL and MKTN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer