PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MKTN vs. FLCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MKTN vs. FLCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF (MKTN) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKTN achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly lower than FLCV's 14.52% return.


MKTN

1D
0.38%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
-0.17%
6M
0.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLCV

1D
0.40%
1M
2.97%
YTD
14.52%
6M
13.75%
1Y
25.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MKTN vs. FLCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MKTN and FLCV is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MKTN vs. FLCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKTN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FLCV
FLCV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FLCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKTN vs. FLCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF (MKTN) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MKTNFLCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.83

MKTN vs. FLCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MKTN vs. FLCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKTN drawdown since its inception was -4.13%, smaller than the maximum FLCV drawdown of -15.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKTN and FLCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MKTNFLCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-15.93%

+11.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.07%

-0.14%

-1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-2.01%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

Volatility

MKTN vs. FLCV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MKTNFLCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.75%

11.61%

-4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.75%

14.95%

-8.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.75%

14.95%

-8.20%

Dividends

MKTN vs. FLCV - Dividend Comparison

MKTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than FLCV's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FLCV
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF
0.72%0.83%0.24%
MKTN
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF
0.51%0.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MKTN and FLCV have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCV has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.51% for MKTN.

MKTN is categorized as Long-Short, while FLCV is Large Cap Value Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MKTN and FLCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer