MKTN vs. FLCC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MKTN (Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF) and FLCC (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MKTN is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by Federated, while FLCC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Federated. Both are actively managed. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MKTN charges 1.94%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FLCC.

Performance

MKTN vs. FLCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF (MKTN) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKTN achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly lower than FLCC's 10.61% return.

MKTN

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 4.57%
• 6M: 7.01%
• YTD: 6.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FLCC

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 1.73%
• 6M: 10.65%
• YTD: 10.61%
• 1Y: 18.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	$1.19M	$831.18K	$771.14K
MKTN Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF	$666.28K	$482.62K	$621.59K

MKTN vs. FLCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MKTN Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF	6.46%	3.22%
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	10.61%	2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MKTN and FLCC is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025	0.13

Return for Risk

MKTN vs. FLCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MKTN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLCC

FLCC Risk / Return Rank: 50
FLCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FLCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FLCC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FLCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
FLCC Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MKTN vs. FLCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF (MKTN) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MKTN	FLCC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.23	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.74	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.75	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.77	—

Drawdowns

MKTN vs. FLCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKTN drawdown since its inception was -4.13%, smaller than the maximum FLCC drawdown of -19.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKTN and FLCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MKTN	FLCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-19.18%	+15.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-2.28%	+1.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MKTN	FLCC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.65%	13.23%	-6.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.65%	17.07%	-10.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.65%	17.07%	-10.42%

MKTN vs. FLCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MKTN has a 1.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCC's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

MKTN vs. FLCC - Dividend Comparison

MKTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than FLCC's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	0.46%	0.50%	0.20%
MKTN Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF	0.48%	0.51%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MKTN and FLCC in my portfolio?

MKTN and FLCC have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MKTN or FLCC?

On fees, FLCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MKTN or FLCC?

FLCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for MKTN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MKTN or FLCC?

MKTN has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.46% for FLCC.

What is the main difference between MKTN and FLCC?

MKTN is categorized as Equity Market Neutral, while FLCC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.94% for MKTN and 0.29% for FLCC.