PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCAGX vs. PRSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCAGX vs. PRSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAGX achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly higher than PRSNX's 1.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAGX has outperformed PRSNX with an annualized return of 13.98%, while PRSNX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.13% annualized return.


FCAGX

1D
2.51%
1M
-3.10%
6M
16.20%
YTD
20.72%
1Y
36.19%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
13.98%
ALL TIME*
11.42%

PRSNX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.90%
6M
1.25%
YTD
1.95%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
8.62%
5Y*
2.89%
10Y*
4.13%
ALL TIME*
5.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCAGX vs. PRSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCAGX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A
20.72%10.88%20.21%18.72%-25.57%10.19%36.01%35.97%-4.85%28.62%
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
1.95%7.28%8.77%16.74%-16.27%0.40%8.16%11.94%0.45%6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAGX and PRSNX is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2008

0.15

The correlation between FCAGX and PRSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (10 years) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCAGX vs. PRSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCAGX
FCAGX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FCAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FCAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

PRSNX
PRSNX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PRSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCAGX vs. PRSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCAGXPRSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.38

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.11

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.21

8.72

+0.49

FCAGX vs. PRSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the PRSNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAGX and PRSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCAGX vs. PRSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAGX drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, which is greater than PRSNX's maximum drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAGX and PRSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCAGXPRSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.19%

-19.70%

-41.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.19%

-2.18%

-11.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.76%

-2.40%

-26.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.13%

-19.70%

-19.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.13%

-19.70%

-19.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-1.09%

-4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.42%

-2.10%

-9.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

0.52%

+3.01%

Volatility

FCAGX vs. PRSNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) at 0.37%. This indicates that FCAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCAGXPRSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

0.37%

+5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.98%

2.22%

+15.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.74%

2.73%

+20.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.71%

4.38%

+19.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.94%

4.16%

+18.78%

FCAGX vs. PRSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than PRSNX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCAGX vs. PRSNX - Dividend Comparison

FCAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than PRSNX's 5.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCAGX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A
5.75%6.94%1.20%0.00%0.00%20.36%8.58%5.58%14.80%7.05%0.79%4.32%
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
5.22%6.00%9.32%8.39%3.30%3.95%3.68%6.33%4.89%3.59%3.44%3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCAGX and PRSNX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCAGX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to PRSNX (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAGX dropped -61.19% vs PRSNX's -19.70%.

PRSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCAGX and PRSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer