PRSNX vs. FBND

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PRSNX (T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both funds - PRSNX is a Global Bonds fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, PRSNX returned 3.87%/yr vs 2.54%/yr for FBND. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRSNX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.

Performance

PRSNX vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRSNX achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, PRSNX has outperformed FBND with an annualized return of 3.87%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively lower 2.54% annualized return.

PRSNX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 6M: 3.14%
• 1Y: 7.41%
• 3Y*: 8.03%
• 5Y*: 2.13%
• 10Y*: 3.87%

FBND

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 0.72%
• 6M: 0.80%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: 4.73%
• 5Y*: 0.79%
• 10Y*: 2.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRSNX vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRSNX T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund	1.72%	9.31%	5.60%	12.77%	-16.27%	0.40%	8.16%	11.94%	0.45%	6.47%
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	0.72%	7.57%	2.13%	6.81%	-12.54%	-0.43%	9.41%	9.82%	-0.57%	3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PRSNX and FBND is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014	0.61

The correlation between PRSNX and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PRSNX vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRSNX

PRSNX Risk / Return Rank: 89
PRSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PRSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PRSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
PRSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
PRSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FBND

FBND Risk / Return Rank: 35
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRSNX vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRSNX	FBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	1.24	+1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.81	1.84	+2.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.21	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	1.77	+1.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.65	5.07	+10.57

PRSNX vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRSNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRSNX and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRSNX vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRSNX drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRSNX and FBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRSNX	FBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.70%	-17.25%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.18%	-2.66%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.87%	-5.94%	+3.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.70%	-17.25%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.70%	-17.25%	-2.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-1.21%	+1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.35%	-3.34%	+0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	0.93%	-0.45%

Volatility

PRSNX vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) is 0.72%, while Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that PRSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRSNX	FBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.72%	1.13%	-0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.30%	2.84%	-0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86%	3.83%	-0.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.30%	5.93%	-1.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.13%	6.10%	-1.97%

PRSNX vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRSNX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRSNX vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

PRSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than FBND's 4.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	4.69%	4.70%	4.73%	4.26%	3.07%	1.86%	4.25%	2.90%	2.93%	2.56%	2.84%	3.26%
PRSNX T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund	6.64%	7.87%	6.36%	5.08%	3.30%	3.95%	3.68%	6.33%	4.89%	3.59%	3.44%	3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRSNX and FBND in my portfolio?

PRSNX and FBND have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRSNX or FBND?

FBND has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to PRSNX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRSNX dropped -19.70% vs FBND's -17.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.