FCA vs. DRGN
FCA (First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund) and DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCA is a China Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX China Index, while DRGN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BITA China Generative AI Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCA charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DRGN.
Performance
FCA vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCA achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN's 16.56% return.
FCA
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
DRGN
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 16.56%
- 6M
- 18.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCA vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund | 11.99% | 14.78% |
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 16.56% | 26.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCA and DRGN is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCA vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank
FCA
DRGN
FCA vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCA | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.58 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCA | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 1.58 | -1.45 |
Drawdowns
FCA vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCA drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCA and DRGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCA | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -20.86% | -24.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.50% | -7.05% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.62% | -7.93% | -13.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | — | — |
Volatility
FCA vs. DRGN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCA | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.29% | 34.85% | -12.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.59% | 34.85% | -7.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.63% | 34.85% | -8.22% |
FCA vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCA vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison
FCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than DRGN's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 1.04% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund | 2.30% | 2.67% | 5.17% | 5.70% | 6.00% | 4.91% | 4.12% | 3.73% | 3.10% | 2.30% | 2.51% | 4.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCA and DRGN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FCA.
FCA has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 1.04% for DRGN.
FCA is categorized as China Equities, while DRGN is Technology Equities. FCA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX China Index, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FCA and 0.39% for DRGN.
Find the right allocation for FCA and DRGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer