PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCA vs. DRGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCA vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCA achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN's 16.56% return.


FCA

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.70%
YTD
11.99%
6M
10.11%
1Y
44.72%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.93%

DRGN

1D
0.42%
1M
5.53%
YTD
16.56%
6M
18.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCA vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FCA and DRGN is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCA vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCA
FCA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

DRGN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCA vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCADRGNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.48

FCA vs. DRGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCADRGNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

1.58

-1.45

Drawdowns

FCA vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCA drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCA and DRGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCADRGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-20.86%

-24.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.50%

-7.05%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.62%

-7.93%

-13.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

Volatility

FCA vs. DRGN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCADRGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.29%

34.85%

-12.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.59%

34.85%

-7.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.63%

34.85%

-8.22%

FCA vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCA vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison

FCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than DRGN's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRGN
Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
1.04%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
2.30%2.67%5.17%5.70%6.00%4.91%4.12%3.73%3.10%2.30%2.51%4.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCA and DRGN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FCA.

FCA has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 1.04% for DRGN.

FCA is categorized as China Equities, while DRGN is Technology Equities. FCA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX China Index, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FCA and 0.39% for DRGN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCA and DRGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer