FCA vs. ASHX
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX).
FCA and ASHX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCA is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX China Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2011. ASHX is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2015. Both FCA and ASHX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FCA vs. ASHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCA vs. ASHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund | 10.86% | 45.20% | 14.07% | -8.28% | -17.61% | -0.65% | 11.80% | 18.72% | -18.30% | 60.26% |
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | -13.59% | -26.45% | 2.64% | 42.24% | 35.03% | -27.51% | 20.14% |
Returns By Period
FCA
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- 1Y
- 53.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
ASHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCA vs. ASHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCA vs. ASHX — Risk / Return Rank
FCA
ASHX
FCA vs. ASHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCA | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.56 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.08 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCA | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between FCA and ASHX is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCA vs. ASHX - Dividend Comparison
FCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, while ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund | 2.32% | 2.67% | 5.17% | 5.70% | 6.00% | 4.91% | 4.12% | 3.73% | 3.10% | 2.30% | 2.51% | 4.13% |
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 1.78% | 1.07% | 2.48% | 19.46% | 2.91% |
Drawdowns
FCA vs. ASHX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCA | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.75% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.81% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | — | — |
Volatility
FCA vs. ASHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCA | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.19% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.43% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.57% | — | — |