FBYY vs. PLTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FBYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - FBYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). FBYY is actively managed, while PLTM is passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.

Performance

FBYY vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF (FBYY) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBYY achieves a -19.58% return, which is significantly lower than PLTM's -9.33% return.

FBYY

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: -19.58%
• 6M: -19.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTM

• 1D: -3.82%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: -9.33%
• 6M: 11.67%
• 1Y: 71.85%
• 3Y*: 22.22%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBYY vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBYY GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF	-19.58%	-11.23%
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	-9.33%	32.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FBYY and PLTM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025	0.20

Return for Risk

FBYY vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTM

PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 36
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBYY vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF (FBYY) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBYY	PLTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.71	0.24	-1.94

Drawdowns

FBYY vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBYY drawdown since its inception was -35.38%, smaller than the maximum PLTM drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBYY and PLTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBYY	PLTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.38%	-42.32%	+6.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.52%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.93%	-33.02%	+1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.92%	-18.55%	-4.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBYY	PLTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.90%	51.40%	-26.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.90%	32.83%	-7.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.90%	30.98%	-6.08%

FBYY vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBYY vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison

FBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.44%, while PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FBYY GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF	40.44%	10.35%
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBYY and PLTM in my portfolio?

FBYY and PLTM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FBYY or PLTM?

On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBYY or PLTM?

PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FBYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBYY or PLTM?

FBYY has the higher dividend yield at 40.44%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.

What is the main difference between FBYY and PLTM?

FBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while PLTM is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for FBYY and 0.50% for PLTM.