FBY vs. SPYI
FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBY returned -10.52% vs 23.93% for SPYI. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for SPYI.
Performance
FBY vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBY achieves a -9.36% return, which is significantly lower than SPYI's 8.26% return.
FBY
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -9.36%
- 6M
- -8.42%
- 1Y
- -10.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYI
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBY vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | -9.36% | 1.98% | 44.42% | 15.65% |
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | 8.26% | 16.67% | 19.03% | 0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBY and SPYI is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023 | 0.57 |
The correlation between FBY and SPYI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBY vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank
FBY
SPYI
FBY vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBY | SPYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | 2.50 | -2.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | 3.42 | -3.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.49 | -0.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 3.17 | -3.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 16.55 | -17.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBY | SPYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | 2.50 | -2.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.23 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
FBY vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, which is greater than SPYI's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and SPYI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBY | SPYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -16.47% | -15.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.50% | -7.72% | -21.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.10% | 0.00% | -22.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -1.80% | -6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.35% | 1.48% | +11.87% |
Volatility
FBY vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) at 1.73%. This indicates that FBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBY | SPYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 1.73% | +4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.94% | 7.40% | +14.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.73% | 9.61% | +19.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.46% | 12.92% | +15.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.46% | 12.92% | +15.54% |
FBY vs. SPYI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBY vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison
FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.90%, more than SPYI's 11.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | 57.90% | 55.43% | 53.89% | 8.31% | 0.00% |
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | 11.58% | 11.70% | 12.04% | 12.01% | 4.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBY and SPYI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBY has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to SPYI (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBY dropped -31.53% vs SPYI's -16.47%.
On 1-year performance, SPYI leads with 23.93% vs -10.52% for FBY. On fees, SPYI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, SPYI has been the lower-risk option at 1.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPYI has performed better with a 23.93% return vs -10.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for FBY.
FBY has the higher dividend yield at 57.90%, compared with 11.58% for SPYI.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for FBY and 0.68% for SPYI.
SPYI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBY and SPYI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer