PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBY vs. IPDP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBY vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FBY

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
-9.36%
6M
-8.42%
1Y
-10.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IPDP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBY vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBY vs. IPDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBY
FBY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

IPDP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBY vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBYIPDPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.63

FBY vs. IPDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBYIPDPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

Drawdowns

FBY vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and IPDP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBYIPDPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.53%

0.00%

-31.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.10%

0.00%

-22.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

0.00%

-7.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.35%

Volatility

FBY vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBYIPDPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.73%

0.00%

+28.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.46%

0.00%

+28.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.46%

0.00%

+28.46%

FBY vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBY vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.90%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
FBY
YieldMax META Option Income ETF
57.90%55.43%53.89%8.31%
IPDP
Dividend Performers ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, FBY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FBY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

FBY has the higher dividend yield at 57.90%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for FBY and 1.52% for IPDP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBY and IPDP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer