PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZY vs. CONY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZY vs. CONY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZY achieves a -2.38% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -24.40% return.


AMZY

1D
-3.73%
1M
-10.79%
YTD
-2.38%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
5.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CONY

1D
1.00%
1M
-8.90%
YTD
-24.40%
6M
-29.90%
1Y
-47.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZY vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
-2.38%10.39%35.28%7.42%
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
-24.40%-26.34%23.62%76.18%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZY and CONY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZY vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZY
AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CONY
CONY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZY vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZYCONYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.86

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

-0.75

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.70

-1.20

+1.90

AMZY vs. CONY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZY Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the CONY Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZY and CONY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZY vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZY drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, smaller than the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZY and CONY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZYCONYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.70%

-63.57%

+39.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.61%

-63.39%

+43.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.84%

-57.17%

+44.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-22.78%

+17.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.17%

39.72%

-31.55%

Volatility

AMZY vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) is 8.10%, while YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a volatility of 15.64%. This indicates that AMZY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZYCONYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.10%

15.64%

-7.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.19%

44.35%

-27.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.28%

57.83%

-33.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.15%

59.90%

-34.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.15%

59.90%

-34.75%

AMZY vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZY has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than CONY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZY vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison

AMZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.63%, less than CONY's 198.50% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
58.63%52.59%47.91%9.90%
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
198.50%192.07%155.66%16.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZY and CONY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CONY has higher volatility (15.64%) compared to AMZY (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZY dropped -23.70% vs CONY's -63.57%.

On 1-year performance, AMZY leads with 5.68% vs -47.70% for CONY. On fees, CONY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMZY has been the lower-risk option at 8.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMZY has performed better with a 5.68% return vs -47.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CONY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZY.

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 198.50%, compared with 58.63% for AMZY.

Their fees differ too: 1.09% for AMZY and 0.99% for CONY.

AMZY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZY and CONY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer