PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZY vs. AMZW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZY vs. AMZW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) and Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZY achieves a -2.38% return, which is significantly lower than AMZW's -1.49% return.


AMZY

1D
-3.73%
1M
-10.79%
YTD
-2.38%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
5.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMZW

1D
-5.45%
1M
-15.53%
YTD
-1.49%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
7.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZY vs. AMZW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AMZY and AMZW is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.97

The correlation between AMZY and AMZW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZY vs. AMZW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZY
AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZW
AMZW Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
AMZW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZW Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZW Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZY vs. AMZW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) and Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZYAMZWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.07

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

0.29

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.70

0.66

+0.04

AMZY vs. AMZW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZY Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is comparable to the AMZW Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZY and AMZW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZY vs. AMZW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZY drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, smaller than the maximum AMZW drawdown of -26.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZY and AMZW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZYAMZWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.70%

-26.79%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.61%

-26.79%

+7.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.84%

-18.87%

+6.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-9.12%

+3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.17%

11.76%

-3.59%

Volatility

AMZY vs. AMZW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) is 8.10%, while Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that AMZY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZYAMZWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.10%

12.20%

-4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.19%

26.36%

-9.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.28%

37.51%

-13.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.15%

37.41%

-12.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.15%

37.41%

-12.26%

AMZY vs. AMZW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZY has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than AMZW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZY vs. AMZW - Dividend Comparison

AMZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.63%, more than AMZW's 49.54% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZW
Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF
49.54%25.29%0.00%0.00%
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
58.63%52.59%47.91%9.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, AMZY and AMZW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AMZW has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to AMZY (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZY dropped -23.70% vs AMZW's -26.79%.

On 1-year performance, AMZW leads with 7.74% vs 5.68% for AMZY. On fees, AMZW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMZY has been the lower-risk option at 8.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMZW has performed better with a 7.74% return vs 5.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMZW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZY.

AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 58.63%, compared with 49.54% for AMZW.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for AMZY and 0.99% for AMZW.

AMZY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZY and AMZW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer