FBTC vs. NBIS
FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate, while NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) is a stock. Over the past year, FBTC returned -44.68% vs 245.94% for NBIS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FBTC vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -25.63% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 118.17% return.
FBTC
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- 6M
- -31.89%
- YTD
- -25.63%
- 1Y
- -44.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.64%
NBIS
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -36.30%
- 6M
- 67.96%
- YTD
- 118.17%
- 1Y
- 245.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 264.48%
FBTC vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | -25.63% | -6.56% | 39.67% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 118.17% | 202.18% | 46.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTC and NBIS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBTC vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank
FBTC
NBIS
FBTC vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBTC | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.34 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 5.45 | -6.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 11.87 | -13.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBTC vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, smaller than the maximum NBIS drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and NBIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTC | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.35% | -58.27% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.35% | -45.47% | -7.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.20% | -36.30% | -11.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.73% | -18.90% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.39% | 20.83% | +12.56% |
Volatility
FBTC vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) is 10.58%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 32.60%. This indicates that FBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBTC | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.58% | 32.60% | -22.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.53% | 75.89% | -41.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.30% | 106.91% | -62.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.71% | 110.41% | -60.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.71% | 110.41% | -60.70% |
Dividends
FBTC vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison
Neither FBTC nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FBTC and NBIS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBIS has higher volatility (32.60%) compared to FBTC (10.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTC dropped -53.35% vs NBIS's -58.27%.
NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBTC and NBIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer